These findings suggest that the total score may not be as accurate when compared to individual technique flaws and should be used with caution. The same level of consistency was not seen when evaluating each technique flaw. CONCLUSIONĪll raters had at least good reliability estimates for the total score. The total score had moderate interrater reliability in both sessions (Session 1: ICC 2,2 = 0.64 95% CI (Confidence Interval) (0.34-0.81) Standard Error Measurement (SEM) = 0.66 technique flaws and Session 2: ICC 2,2 = 0.56 95% CI (0.04-0.79) SEM = 1.30). RESULTSĮleven of 50 individual technique flaws were above the acceptable level (K α = 0.80). Reliability estimates were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for total scores of 10 technique flaws and Krippendorff α (K α) for the individual technique flaws (ordinal). Raters used the online standardized training, scored 41 videos of participants’ TJAs, then scored them again two weeks later. Three raters of different professions: a PT, an AT, and a Strength and Conditioning Coach Certified (SCCC) were selected due to their expertise with injury and movement. The website was then validated (both face and content) by four experts. STUDY DESIGNĪ website was created by a physical therapist (PT) with videos, written descriptors of the 10 TJA technique flaws, and examples of what constituted no flaw, minor flaw, or major flaw (0,1,2) using published standards. The authors hypothesized that the total score will have moderate to excellent levels of intra- and interrater reliability. To determine the reliability of the TJA using varied healthcare professionals following an online standardized training program. Although the TJA has broad clinical applicability, there is no standardized training to maximize the TJA measurement properties. 2011 33(3): 21–35.The Tuck Jump Assessment (TJA) is a test used to assess technique flaws during a 10-second, high intensity, jumping bout. Real-time assessment and neuromuscular training feedback techniques to prevent anterior cruciate ligament injury in female athletes. Does an in-season only neuromuscular training protocol reduce deficits quantified by the tuck jump assessment? Clinics in Sports Medicine. Klugman MF, Brent JL, Myer GD, Ford KR, Hewett TE. Tuck jump assessment for reducing anterior cruciate ligament injury risk.
#Tuck jumps diagram trial#
This finding agrees with the randomized controlled trial conducted by Myer et al, which found a reduced Frontal Plane Knee Angle following augmented feedback training of 37.9% over 3 trials.ġ. Additionally, following augmented feedback training, deficits measured during the tuck-jump assessment were reduced by 23.6% in young female athletes (Stroube et al, 2013). Video Demonstration from Brian Schwabe, DPT, CSCSīoth a neuromuscular training program (decreased from 5.4 ± 1.6 points to 4.9 ± 1.0 points) and a standard soccer in-season training program (decreased from 5.8 ± 1.6 to 5.0 ± 1.5 points) were able to significantly improve Tuck Jump Assessment scores (Klugman et al, 2011). Patient attempts to lift the knees to hip height and attempts to land on the same spot.Each participant carries out continuous tuck jumps for 10 seconds.
0 kommentar(er)
